Current:Home > StocksHigh winds – up to 80 mph – may bring critical fire risk to California -Keystone Wealth Vision
High winds – up to 80 mph – may bring critical fire risk to California
View
Date:2025-04-19 01:27:03
SAN FRANCISCO – Residents of highly populated areas in California are –uptomph–being urged to exercise caution around fire sources as several factors combine to dramatically increase the risk of blazes Monday – and even more so later in the week.
More than 25 million of the state’s 39 million people will be under red flag warnings or fire weather watches this week because of warm temperatures, low humidity and powerful winds, as high as 80 mph in some elevations, strong enough to qualify for a hurricane.
“Gusty easterly winds and low relative humidity will support elevated to critical fire weather over coastal portions of California today into Thursday,’’ the National Weather Service said Monday.
The offshore air currents, known as Santa Ana winds in Southern California and Diablo winds in the San Francisco Bay Area, have been blamed in the past for knocking down power lines and igniting wildfires, then quickly spreading them amid dry vegetation.
In a warning for Los Angeles and Ventura counties that applied to Sunday night and all of Monday, the NWS office in Los Angeles said wind gusts in the mountains – typically the hardest areas for firefighters to reach – could fluctuate from 55 to 80 mph.
“Stronger and more widespread Santa Ana winds Wednesday and Thursday,’’ the posting said.
San Francisco Chronicle meteorologist Anthony Edwards said this week’s offshore winds – which defy the usual pattern by blowing from inland west toward the ocean – represent the strongest such event in the state in several years.
Edwards added that winds atop the Bay Area’s highest mountains could reach 70 mph, which will likely prompt preemptive power shutoffs from utility company PG&E, and may go even higher in the Sierra Nevada foothills.
The Bay Area’s red flag warning runs from 11 a.m. Tuesday until early Thursday, and it includes a warning to “have an emergency plan in case a fire starts near you.’’
veryGood! (948)
Related
- Meet first time Grammy nominee Charley Crockett
- In Remote Town in Mali, Africa’s Climate Change Future is Now
- Is Cheryl Burke Dating After Matthew Lawrence Divorce? She Says…
- In the San Joaquin Valley, Nothing is More Valuable than Water (Part 1)
- At site of suspected mass killings, Syrians recall horrors, hope for answers
- Jonah Hill and Olivia Millar Step Out After Welcoming First Baby
- Spoil Your Dad With the Best Father's Day Gift Ideas Under $50 From Nordstrom Rack
- Senate 2020: Iowa Farmers Are Feeling the Effects of Climate Change. That Could Make Things Harder for Joni Ernst
- Alex Murdaugh’s murder appeal cites biased clerk and prejudicial evidence
- How Much Does Climate Change Cost? Biden Raises Carbon’s Dollar Value, but Not by Nearly Enough, Some Say
Ranking
- Travis Hunter, the 2
- Fact Check: Did Kamala Harris Sue Exxon Over Climate Change?
- UPS strike imminent if pay agreement not reached by Friday, Teamsters warn
- In ‘After Water’ Project, 12 Writers Imagine Life in Climate Change-Altered Chicago
- B.A. Parker is learning the banjo
- 24-Hour Solar Energy: Molten Salt Makes It Possible, and Prices Are Falling Fast
- Could Climate Change Spark a Financial Crisis? Candidates Warn Fed It’s a Risk
- Kim Cattrall Talked About Moving On Before Confirming She'll Appear on And Just Like That...
Recommendation
Hackers hit Rhode Island benefits system in major cyberattack. Personal data could be released soon
Tim McGraw and Faith Hill’s Daughter Gracie Shares Update After Taking Ozempic for PCOS
Even With a 50-50 Split, a Biden Administration Senate Could Make Big Strides on Climate
Where Jill Duggar Stands With Her Controversial Family Today
Nearly half of US teens are online ‘constantly,’ Pew report finds
How Much Does Climate Change Cost? Biden Raises Carbon’s Dollar Value, but Not by Nearly Enough, Some Say
Exxon Accused of Pressuring Witnesses in Climate Fraud Case
Texas Judge Gives No Restitution to Citgo’s Victims in Pollution Case With Wide Implications