Current:Home > MarketsFossil Fuel Subsidies Top $450 Billion Annually, Study Says -Keystone Wealth Vision
Fossil Fuel Subsidies Top $450 Billion Annually, Study Says
View
Date:2025-04-24 23:41:22
The governments of the world’s 20 largest economies spend more than $450 billion annually subsidizing the fossil fuel industry, a new analysis has concluded, four times more than what they spend on renewable energy.
The report by Oil Change International, a Washington-based advocacy organization, and the Overseas Development Institute, a British research group, calculates the amount of money the G20 nations provide to oil, gas and coal companies through tax breaks, low cost loans and government investments. It comes just weeks before country representatives convene in Paris to forge a climate deal that aims to put the global energy economy on a path to zero emissions, and it underscores the obstacles this effort faces.
“If the G20 leaders want to be credible ahead of the Paris talks, they need to show they’re serious,” said Alex Doukas, a senior campaigner at OCI and one of the authors of the report. “Handing money to fossil fuel companies undermines their credibility.”
Doukas said phasing out subsidies should be a top priority because it hinders the transition to clean energy at the scale needed.
Researchers at Oil Change International tracked three main ways in which governments subsidize fossil fuel companies:
National subsidies: Direct spending by governments to build out fossil fuel infrastructure and tax exemptions for investments in drilling and mining.
State owned companies: Government-owned oil and gas companies that benefit from government involvement.
Public financing: Investments in fossil fuel production through government-backed banks and other financial institutions.
The subsidy data was collected from sources including government budgets and commercial databases. Doukas cautioned that some of the subsidies were not easily quantifiable and the figures in the report are likely underestimates. Still, the report gives a picture of the magnitude of the investments in fossil fuels, he said.
Countries vary in how they subsidize the fossil fuel industry. In China, for instance, a majority of the oil and gas companies are owned by the state and it invested more than $75 billion a year in 2013 and 2014 in fossil fuel production.
The vast majority of subsides to the industry in the U.S., on the other hand, are through tax breaks. The U.S. provided at least $20 billion a year in tax exemptions for fossil fuel companies in 2013 and 2014.
Scientists have warned that if the worst effects of climate change are to be avoided, global temperature rise must be kept under 2 degrees Celsius. In order to do that, researchers have estimated that we must keep at least three quarters of the global fossil fuel reserves in the ground.
“Exploration subsidies [in the U.S.] are particularly pernicious,” said Doukas. “At the very moment when we know we have to keep three-fourth of the fossil fuels in the ground, we’re using public money to incentivize their development.”
The Oil Change International’s analysis follows a report by the International Energy Agency this week that concluded that the world’s transition to a low-carbon energy is too slow. Low oil prices and an increasing reliance on coal in developing countries has impeded the growth in renewables, the agency found.
The IEA has also estimated that countries spent $121 billion in 2013 on renewable energy. That figure is about a quarter of the amount spent on fossil fuels in the G20 countries alone, according to the OCI-ODI analysis.
“Fossil fuel subsidies are public enemy number one for the growth of renewable energy,” Fatih Birol, head of the IEA, told the Guardian. “I don’t understand some countries—they have renewable energy programs and at the same time they have subsidies for fossil fuels. This is, in my view, myopic.”
veryGood! (3272)
Related
- The White House is cracking down on overdraft fees
- PGA Tour officials to testify before Senate subcommittee
- We asked, you answered: How do you feel about the end of the COVID-19 'emergency'
- American Climate: A Shared Experience Connects Survivors of Disaster
- EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
- Two and a Half Men's Angus T. Jones Is Unrecognizable in Rare Public Sighting
- Wildfires Trap Thousands on Beach in Australia as Death Toll Rises
- Amazon sued for allegedly signing customers up for Prime without consent
- Skins Game to make return to Thanksgiving week with a modern look
- Kim Zolciak Shares Message on Manipulation and Toxic Behavior Amid Kroy Biermann Divorce
Ranking
- Juan Soto to be introduced by Mets at Citi Field after striking record $765 million, 15
- Overstock.com wins auction for Bed Bath and Beyond's assets
- Vaccination and awareness could help keep mpox in check this summer
- Teen volleyball player who lost her legs in violent car crash sues city of St. Louis and 2 drivers involved
- 'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
- How Drag Queen Icon Divine Inspired The Little Mermaid's Ursula
- Trump’s EPA Starts Process for Replacing Clean Power Plan
- House sidesteps vote on Biden impeachment resolution amid GOP infighting
Recommendation
North Carolina justices rule for restaurants in COVID
Search for missing OceanGate sub ramps up near Titanic wreck with deep-sea robot scanning ocean floor
Heart transplant recipient dies after being denied meds in jail; ACLU wants an inquiry
Keep Up With Khloe Kardashian and Tristan Thompson's Cutest Moments With True and Tatum
Military service academies see drop in reported sexual assaults after alarming surge
Sample from Bryan Kohberger matches DNA found at Idaho crime scene, court documents say
Coronavirus FAQ: 'Emergency' over! Do we unmask and grin? Or adjust our worries?
Cap & Trade Shows Its Economic Muscle in the Northeast, $1.3B in 3 Years