Current:Home > InvestFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -Keystone Wealth Vision
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
View
Date:2025-04-13 03:48:02
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (35435)
Related
- Woman dies after Singapore family of 3 gets into accident in Taiwan
- Bryce Harper has quite the birthday party in Phillies' historic playoff power show
- Disney attorneys want to question former administrator in lawsuit with DeSantis appointees
- What Google’s antitrust trial means for the way you search and more
- California DMV apologizes for license plate that some say mocks Oct. 7 attack on Israel
- Can it hurt my career to turn down a promotion? Ask HR
- Jeffrey Epstein survivor who testified against Ghislaine Maxwell dies in Florida
- Malaysia says landslide that killed 31 people last year was caused by heavy rain, not human activity
- Retirement planning: 3 crucial moves everyone should make before 2025
- UK national, South African and local guide killed in an attack near a Ugandan national park
Ranking
- 2025 'Doomsday Clock': This is how close we are to self
- Gaza’s doctors struggle to save hospital blast survivors as Middle East rage grows
- Ex-Michigan gubernatorial candidate sentenced to 2 months behind bars for Capitol riot role
- Is Choice buying Wyndham? Hotel operator offers nearly $8B for buyout
- Warm inflation data keep S&P 500, Dow, Nasdaq under wraps before Fed meeting next week
- Maren Morris files for divorce from Ryan Hurd after 5 years of marriage
- Rolls-Royce is cutting up to 2,500 jobs in an overhaul of the U.K. jet engine maker
- Put another nickel in: How Cincinnati helped make jukeboxes cool
Recommendation
New Zealand official reverses visa refusal for US conservative influencer Candace Owens
South Carolina teen elected first Black homecoming queen in school's 155 years of existence
Amid Israel-Hamas war, Muslim and Arab Americans fear rise in hate crimes
Small plane crash kills 3 people in northern Arizona
Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
Georgia deputy fatally shoots 'kind' man who served 16 years for wrongful conviction
NIL hearing shows desire to pass bill to help NCAA. How it gets there is uncertain
Maryland medical waste incinerator to pay $1.75M fine for exposing public to biohazardous material